HIV Neurodegenerative Mechanisms Compared to Other Neurodegenerative Diseases – by Valquíria M. de Figueiredo, Tiago A. O. Silva

HIV Neurodegenerative Mechanisms Compared to Other Neurodegenerative Diseases – by Valquíria Merjan de Figueiredo, Tiago Andrade de Oliveira e Silva

 

Introduction

hiv hand c

This article describes HIV-1 factors and mechanisms involved in neurodegeneration and compares them with those of other neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and Huntington’s disease.

According to estimates from the UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic, 2.7 million people were newly infected with the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV) in 2010, down from 3.2 million in 2001. Because of AIDS prevention projects, new HIV infections are declining in many countries. However, the overall number of people living with HIV has increased because new infections occur each year, and HIV antiretroviral treatment prolongs survival. In 2009, there were 33.3 million people with the disease. (Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS [UNAIDS] 2010)

HIV-1 primarily infects CD4+ T cells and cells of the monocyte–macrophage lineage. HIV-1-infected monocyte–macrophage traverses the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and enters the central nervous system (CNS) early after primary infection, within 1–2 weeks after viral infection coincident with the peak of viremia. (David et al., 1992)(Eugenin et al, 2011). The integrity of the BBB is compromised by the actions of the HIV-1 virions, viral proteins, and host cytokines and chemokines acting at both sides of this barrier. This compromise results in disruption and dysregulation of the normal function of the BBB, allowing more rapid and greater entry of  free HIV-1virus and HIV-1-infected cells into the CNS. (Marianne Strazza et al, 2011).

Once in the brain, both free virus and virus-infected cells are able to infect neighboring resident microglia and a small population of astrocytes. (Eugenin E.A. et al, 2011). The virus invades the nervous system, first causing glial neuroinflammatory responses and second, neurodegeneration. These mechanisms are critical in producing cognitive deficits and behavioral and motor disorders (Prasanta K. Dash et al, 2011).  The mechanisms can be divided in three groups: those dependent on viral factors, which are proteins encoded by the viral genome; those dependent on host factors, such as cytokines and chemokines; and those dependent on behavioral co-factors, which are social or behavioral characteristics (Ellis et. al, 2009).

HIv fusão

Viral factors that lead to neurodegeneration have been studied ever since the discovery of HIV. The ones best established to cause injury to the CNS are glycoprotein 120 (gp120), trans-activator of transcriptase protein (Tat), viral protein R (VPR) and negative factor (Nef). These factors are responsible for different mechanisms that lead to neurodegeneration and which can be divided into several groups: Damage to the Blood Brain Barrier (BBB); Excitotoxicity; Oxidative Stress; Mitochondrial dysfunction; Calcium deregulation (Strazza et al. 2007); Signaling alterations; and defective protein quality control (Kragh, 2012). Each protein and its known mechanism will be considered in this article.

HIV co-receptor

 

HIV-1 Associated Neurocognitive Disorders (HAND) remain the most common CNS disease linked to advanced viral infection despite the widespread use of antiretroviral therapy (Prasanta K. Dash et al, 2011). The prevalence of HAND seems to be increasing and the main reasons for this may be advanced aging in subjects infected with HIV and increased lifespan afforded by combined antiretroviral therapy (CART). Before the advent of CART, frank dementia or encephalitis were common, now they are rare (Hangxiu Xu et al, 2011).

 

Viral invasion of the nervous system

 hiv brain entrance

 

The blood brain barrier is composed of brain microvascular endothelial cells (BMECs), basal lamina, and other cell types, including astrocytes, pericytes, perivascular macrophages, parenchymal microglia, and neurons. (Marianne Strazza et al., 2011)

The current model of CNS infection centers around infected circulating monocytes crossing the BBB during all stages of the disease. After entry into the CNS, monocytes repopulate the resident macrophages. The most predominant cell types productively infected by HIV in the CNS are microglial cells and perivascular macrophages. A small population of HIV infected astrocytes has also been detected. (Eugenin E.A. et al, 2011). Significantly, one cell type not identified as infected is the neuron.

Changes in BBB permeability during HIV-1 infection, which promote entry of infected cells into the CNS, are likely the result of multiple intra- and intercellular events involving multiple cell types as well as viral proteins including gp120, Nef and Tat, and host proteins and inflammatory cytokines. Tat and gp120 play a role in altering BBB integrity from the peripheral side as well as within the CNS, whereas the role of Nef has been established primarily through its presence in astrocytes after HIV-1 entry into the CNS. (Marianne Strazza et al., 2011)

hiv brain

      

      Eugenin et al (2011) demonstrate that astrocytes play a role on disruption of BBB: a few HIV-infected astrocytes  (approximately 3.9% of those in vivo) compromise BBB integrity through gap-junctions (GJ). GJs amplify and spread toxic signals to uninfected cells. Thus, uninfected cells (astrocytes and neurons) surrounding clusters of infected cells undergo apoptosis. Through an unknown mechanism, HIV-infected cells are protected from apoptosis (Eugenin et al, 2011). Huang (2012) also identified a similar mechanism in which patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) perpetuate pathology through cell-to-cell spread and seeding of abnormal protein aggregation in experimental models causing neurodegenerative disorders associated with the A-b , tau and a-synuclein proteins. These properties have been compared to those of prions.

 

Despite all these data, the mechanism underlying transfer of HIV-1 through blood-brain barrier is not clearly understood. (Sharma & Bhattacharya, 2009). The importance of this mechanism is that the HIV-1 virus found in the CNS a sanctuary in which it can be protected from the immune system and HAART.

 HIV brain 1

 

Neurodegeneration

 

Because of HAART, HAND have diminished in severity. (Dash et al., 2011) However, milder forms of cognitive impairment frequently occur, despite effective viral control, such as brain volume loss, white matter injury, hippocampal involvement, metabolic disturbances, synaptic pruning and dendritic damage. (Xu et al, 2011).

hiv hand a

 

The brains of HIV-1-infected individuals reveal decreased expression of an integral protein in presynaptic terminals (SYN), of a marker for neuronal cell bodies and dendrites (MAP2), and of axonal NF in cerebral cortex. Such changes reflect substantive neurodegeneration (Dash et al., 2011). These findings correlate with the thesis of Huang et al. (2012), with which the loss of synapses and dendritic spines is better related to cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) than loss of neurons.

 

HIV HAND g

Brain tissue structural alterations have also been found. Dash et al. (2011) observed an increase of fractional anisotropy (FA) in humanized mice with higher viral load and established immunopathology. FA is not very specific to the type of changes. In earlier stages of HIV-1 infection in humanized mice the changes observed could be associated with structural alterations of synaptic and dendritic processes. To observe the alterations, they used diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). DTI can assess displacement of water on the micrometer scale, yielding information about neurodegeneration such as with Alzheimer’s disease. (Dash et al., 2011).

 

HIV HAND E

 

 

The role of gp120 and the NMDA receptor in neurodegeneration

 hiv hand 3

            Glutamate is the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian CNS and it is related to basal excitatory synaptic transmission, neuroplasticity, learning and memory. This neurotransmitter has two classes of receptors: the ionotropic receptors (ion channels) and the metabotropic receptors (G-protein coupled). The ionotropic glutamate receptors are subdivided in three groups (AMPA, NMDA and Kainate receptors).

In HIV infection, the NMDAr has particular importance because HIV-1 coat protein gp120, which is a potent neurotoxin encoded by the viral genome, enhances NMDA receptor activation through indirect and direct mechanisms. In relation to the indirect mechanisms, numerous reports have shown that HIV–gp120 upregulates NMDA receptor activity by enhancing the release soluble factors from glia such as arachidonic acid and proinflammatory cytokines. (Xu et al., 2011).

Hangxiu Xu et al., 2011, showed that direct enhancement of NMDA receptor activity by gp120 involves modifications in the spatial location and focal density of these receptors. First, gp120 binds chemokine receptors, CXCR4 and CCR5, which have been identified in macrophages/microglia, astrocytes and neurons in the brain. With this binding, the HIV-coat protein can increase the size of lipid rafts in neurons by enhancing ceramide through mechanisms that involve redoxsensitive and PKC-dependent translocation of sphingomyelin-catabolizing enzyme nSMase2 to the plasma membrane. (Xu et al., 2011). Gp120 binding to CXCR4 is known to promote a rapid hydrolysis of phospholipase C (PLC). PLC catalyzes the hydrolysis of phosphatidyl inositol bisphosphate (PIP2) leading to the second messengers, diacylglycerol (DAG) and inositol triphosphate (IP3). IP3 induces the release into the cytoplasm of calcium stored in the endoplasmic reticulum and DAG activates protein kinase C (PKC). HIV–gp120 progressively decreases mitochondrial membrane potential by mechanisms that involve IP3-mediated calcium release and PKC. Subsequently, mitochondria promote the translocation of the enzyme nSMase2 to the plasma membrane through the release of free radicals. On the plasma membrane, nSMase2 converts sphingomyelin to ceramide. In confirmation of this mechanism, inhibition of IP3-mediated calcium release and of PKC, and scavenging free radicals prevented gp120 from inducing the translocation of nSMase2 to the plasma membrane or increasing lipid rafts size (Xu et al., 2011). Antagonists of nSMase2 applied in the absence of gp120 reduce the size of lipid rafts. This suggests that this enzyme is essential for maintaining the basal structure of these membrane domains. Lentiviral-delivered shRNA that blocks nSMase2 expression also reduced the size of lipid rafts in the absence of gp120, leading to a similar conclusion. (Xu et al., 2011)

 

HIV HAND x

 

Gp120 improves the trafficing and surface expression of NMDArs by enhancing the activity of both PKA and PKC through differential G-protein subunit signaling pathways. (Gupta et al., 1994; Zheng et al., 1999; Masci et al., 2003, at Hangxiu Xu et al., 2011) The NMDAr is a tetramer composed by two NR1 and two NR2 subunits. (Lynch and Guttmann, 2002; Waxman and Lynch, 2005, at Lauren A. O’Donnell et al., 2006) Phosphorylation of the NR1 C-terminus on serine 897 by PKA and on serine 896 by PKC has been shown to accelerate NMDA receptor trafficking. To verify this, Hangxiu Xu et al., 2011 showed that either PKA or PKC inhibition was sufficient to prevent gp120 from increasing NMDAr surface expression. Other two points relevant to  the enhancement of surface expression of NMDAr are: a) pretreatment of neurons, in vitro, with gp120, which reduced the agonist-induced internalization of the receptor; b) disrupting the structure of lipid rafts after gp120 treatment restored agonist-induced internalization. (Xu et al., 2011). Also because the receptors appear as clusters when localized to lipid rafts domains and punctate (smaller amounts) when located to non-raft regions of the membrane, these data suggest that the stabilization and enlargement of lipid rafts inhibits the internalization of NMDArs. The over-expression of this receptor, especially in lipid rafts, may  lead to death of neurons and glia cells because these receptors promote apoptosis by enhancing the influx of calcium. These mechanisms are similar to what happens in Alzheimer’s disease. According to Huang et al. (2012) the pathogenic interaction among tau, apoE4, Ab and α-synuclein suggests that there are mechanisms to which the effects of these proteins converge, including intracellular calcium homeostasis deregulation, mitochondrial impairment and downstream signaling cascades.

   The hippocampus, basal ganglia (such as striatum), and forebrain (such as frontal cortex), are particularly vulnerable in HIV infection because they are susceptible to NMDAR-mediated excitotoxicity. (O’Donnell et al., 2006) These areas are rich in NMDARs composed of NR2A and NR2B subunits. O’Donnell et al. (2006) demonstrated that hippocampal susceptibility to HIV excitotoxins is predicted by the presence of NR2A- and NR2B-containing NMDA receptors. These data suggest that regional susceptibility to HIV-induced cell damage might be primarily determined by NMDAR subunit expression.

O’Donnell et al.(2006) also demonstrated that the NMDAr activation by HIV results in neuronal calpain activation. Activity of calpains is often associated with cell death models of ischemia, spinal cord injury, and a range of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease and Huntington’s disease (O’Donnell et al., 2006).

 

The role of Tat protein in neurodegeneration 

There is no evidence of direct infection of neurons by HIV-1 (Genis et al., 1992; Speth et al., 2001 at Hee Jung Kim et al., 2008) (Ensoli et al. 1993; Liu et al. 2000), and neuronal cell death is therefore mediated by the chronic production and release of neurotoxic factors by virally-infected and uninfected cells. One of these neurotoxins is Tat protein, which causes a variety of cellular responses, including proliferation, differentiation, cytokine, chemokine and adhesion molecule expression and death. (Milani et al. 1993; Conant et al. 1998; Kumar et al. 1998; Nath et al. 1999; Wang et al. 1999; Woodman et al. 1999; Kutsch et al. 2000; Mcmanus et al. 2000). (Nath et al. 2000; Bonavia et al. 2001; Haughey et al. 2001)

Tat is the transactivator of the HIV-1 long-terminal repeat (LTR) and is necessary for viral replication (Eugenin et al., 2003). Before Tat is present, a small number of RNA transcripts of the virus are made, which allow the Tat protein to be produced. Tat then binds to cellular factors causing its phosphorylation, allowing the increased transcription of all HIV genes (positive feedback). Tat has been associated with enhanced HIV-1 replication by participating in the NF-κB control of the virus’s transcription (Strazza et al. 2011). Then, this protein is secreted by infected astrocytes, microglia and macrophages (Kim et al., 2008) and is taken up by neighboring cells, including neurons (Karn, 1999) (Ensoli et al. 1993; Liu et al. 2000).

Although there are indications that the neurotoxic effect of Tat in human neurons may result from its activity in the nucleus (Jeang et al. 1999), Tat-induced neuronal damage appears to be mediated, in part, by processes that occur in milliseconds or seconds after Tat exposure and therefore, cannot be attributable to nuclear translocation (Eugenin et al., 2003). Indeed, NMDA, non-NMDA, Ca2+ and Na+ channels have been reported to be involved in Tat-mediated toxicity (Eugenin et al., 2003).

Tat can cause persistent activation of the NMDAr (like amyloid-β in Alzheimer’s disease) and it is suggested Tat induces apoptosis by direct and indirect interactions with this receptor. According to a model which proposes indirect mechanisms, Tat binds to the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) (Liu et al., 2000) with subsequent activation of the NMDAr (Haughey et al., 2001; Song et al., 2003; Self et al., 2004). The resulting Ca2+ rise (Bonavia et al., 2001; Perez et al., 2001; Haughey and Mattson, 2002) activates neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) leading to cell death (Kruman et al., 1998). Indeed, the formation of a macromolecular complex involving LRP, postsynaptic density protein 95 (PSD95), the NMDAr and nNOS was shown to be an early step in Tat-induced apoptosis (Kim et al., 2008).

According to models for direct mechanisms, Tat interacts with a specific polyamine site in NMDA channels of neurons and this interaction contributes to Tat-mediated neurotoxicity, probably due to positive modulation of NMDA channel activity (Eugenin et al., 2003). Tat-induced toxicity was most significant when NR1 subunit of the NMDA receptor was expressed with the NR2A or NR2B subunit (Li et al., 2008). The NMDA receptor is a heteromeric receptor channel that is formed of two subunits of NR1 and two subunits of either NR2A or NR2B.

Midde et al. (2012) also described a mechanism in which Tat acts at the dopamine transporter (DAT) and at the vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT2). These authors indicated that Tat regulates DAT function through a PKC-dependent mechanism that internalizes the DAT. The effect of Tat was also greater for VMAT2 protein than for the DAT protein. These findings may explain the increase in extracellular dopamine, which has already been proposed as one of the indirect mechanisms of the HIV-1 virus toxicity.

Eugenin et al., 2003, show that two proteins, Monocyte Chemo-attractant Protein-1 (MCP-1 or CCL2) and Regulated upon Activation Normal T cell Expressed and Secreted (RANTES) inhibit Tat- and NMDAr-induced apoptosis in mixed cultures of human neurons and astrocytes by reducing the extracellular levels of glutamate and, in neurons, by regulating the intracellular trafficking of Tat and NMDAr subunit, NR1 expression.

Tat also causes a proteasome-mediated degradation of microtubule associated protein 2 (MAP2) and the collapse of cytoskeletal filaments (Aprea et al., 2006), but the mechanisms are still unclear.

 

HIV HAND q

http://varuncnmicro.blogspot.com.br/2013/09/no-tit-for-hiv-tat.html

HIV HAND Effects of TAT

http://varuncnmicro.blogspot.com.br/2013/09/no-tit-for-hiv-tat.html

 

 

The role of VPR in neurodegeneration

 

VPR was initially studied as a neurodegenerative protein after it was found in brain of HIV-infected persons. Jones et al. (2007) concluded that VPR causes neuronal apoptosis, through cytochrome C release, p53 induction and caspase-9 activation, and also exerting a depressive effect on neuronal currents. They also determined, through mouse models, that the regions in the brain most affected by this protein were the basal ganglia, causing neurobehavioral abnormalities, and the cerebral cortex, causing aberrant motor activity.

The main mechanisms of action of VPR described by Jones et al. (2007) are: changes in neuronal membrane potential; induction of the internal apoptosis pathway in neurons through direct interaction with mitochondrial membrane or indirectly increasing the load of Ca2+ inside the cell; and induction of secretion by glial cells of cellular neurotoxins. The changes in Ca2+-dependent BK channels caused by VPR can explain both the changes in neuronal membrane potential and the induction of apoptosis. So VPR is more closely related to the induction of apoptosis than the activation of the immune system. (Kramer-Hämmerle et al. 2005). Kramer-Hämmerle et al. (2005) have also shown that the effect of VPR injury is directly associated with the age of the infected patient.

 

 

The Role of Nef in neurodegeneration

           

According to Vermeire et al. (2011), Nef is a key protein in rearranging the signaling and trafficking pathways of the infected host cell, acting in a way that increases viral replication and spreading of the infection. Nef physically interacts with specific cellular proteins involved in these pathways through its multiple effector domains. Many different biological effects result from these interactions and they all seem to cooperate in a two-pronged strategy to promote viral spread. First, by evading the anti-viral immune responses of the host and second, by directly enhancing viral replication by subverting T cell signaling pathways and facilitating T cell activation, Nef enhances the activity of the HIV-1 LTR promoter, which in turn may promote virion production. Also, Nef is thought to increase the release of viral particles by down-modulating the CD4 receptor on the virus-producing cells. Second, although still controversial, remodeling of the host actin cytoskeleton by Nef may promote the cell-to-cell transmission of virions.

It has been suggested that Nef is capable of altering electrophysiological properties of neurons. Nef also causes monocytes/macrophages to release various proinflammatory factors. It affects mainly astrocytes by altering their biological properties. Stable expression of Nef is tolerated by astrocytes but Nef also modulates the sphingomyelinase signaling pathway triggered by TNF-α (Kramer-Hämmerle et al., 2005).

According to Kragh et al. (2012), the Nef protein has an injury mechanism similar to that of Tau protein in Alzheimer’s Disease and α-syn protein in Huntington’s Disease. It has been shown that the Nef protein acts as an anti-autophagic maturation factor, blocking the lysosomal fusion, inhibiting its maturation. This mechanism can also stabilize a new intracellular compartment for the HIV biogenesis.

 

Discussion

This article reviews direct mechanisms that lead to neurodegeneration in HIV infection. As AD is the most common neurodegenerative disorder (Niedowicz, 2011) affecting over 5 million people in the USA (Crews and Masliah, 2010), we propose to compare the mechanisms of neuronal death in these diseases.

AD is characterized by cognitive impairment, progressive neurodegeneration and formation of amyloid-β (Aβ)-containing plaques and neurofibrillary tangles composed of hyperphosphorylated tau. The neurodegenerative process in AD is initially characterized by synaptic damage accompanied by neuronal loss. (Crews and Masliah, 2010).

alzheimer 4 Alzheimer a alzheimer_proteinatau

 

The Aβ peptide is produced from the larger amyloid-β precursor protein (APP). (Niedowicz, 2011). Abnormal accumulation of Aβ resulting in the formation of toxic oligomers is the result of an imbalance between the levels of Aβ production, aggregation and clearance. (Crews and Masliah, 2010). Most recent evidence indicates that soluble oligomers Aβ are the major cause of synaptic dysfunction and ultimately neurodegeneration. Soluble oligomeric Aβ has been shown to interact with several proteins, for example glutamatergic receptors of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) type (like gp120 and Tat protein) and proteins responsible for maintaining glutamate homeostasis via uptake and release (Crews and Masliah, 2010) (Danysz and Parsons, 2012).

Synaptic NMDA receptor activation is neuroprotective, whereas extrasynaptic NMDA receptors trigger neuronal death and/or neurodegenerative processes, as noted above. Recent data suggest that chronic activation of extrasynaptic NMDA receptors leads to a sustained neuronal amyloid-β release and could be involved in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (Bordji et al., 2012). Strong support for the clinical relevance of such interactions is provided by the NMDA receptor antagonist memantine. This substance is the only NMDA receptor antagonist used clinically in the treatment of AD.  (Danysz and Parsons, 2012) (Bordji et al., 2012) (Farlow, 2004).

val 

 

 

Valquíria Merjan de Figueiredo: IXa turma Medicina UFGD

 

 

 

tiago

 

 

Tiago Andrade de Oliveira e Silva-médico, Xa turma UFGD-residente em Neurocirurgia-

 

 

 

 

 

References

Bordji K, Becerril-Ortega J, Buisson A. Synapses. NMDA receptor activity and neuronal Aβ production in Alzheimer’s disease. Rev Neurosci. 2011;22(3):285-94. Epub 2011 May 16.

Danysz W, Parsons CG. Alzheimer’s disease, β-amyloid, glutamate, NMDA receptors and memantine – searching for the connections. Br J Pharmacol. 2012 May 30.

Deepak Sharma & Jayanta Bhattacharya. Cellular & molecular basis of HIV-associated neuropathogenesis. Indian J Med Res 129, June 2009, pp 637-651

 

  1. A. Eugenin et al. MCP-1 (CCL2) protects human neurons and astrocytes from NMDA or HIV-tat-induced apoptosis. Journal of Neurochemistry, 2003, 85, 1299–1311

 

Eugenin EA, King JE, Nath A, Calderon TM, Zukin RS, Bennett MV, Berman JW HIV-Tat induces formation of an LRP-PSD-95- NMDAr-nNOS complex that promotes apoptosis in neurons and astrocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007 104:3438 –3443.

 

Ellis, Ronald J. et al. HIV Infection and the Central Nervous System: A Primer. Neuropsychol Rev (2009) 19:144–151

 

Eliseo A. Eugenin, Janice E. Clements, M. Christine Zink, and Joan W. Berman. Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection of Human Astrocytes Disrupts Blood–Brain Barrier Integrity by a Gap Junction-Dependent Mechanism. The Journal of Neuroscience, June 29, 2011 • 31(26):9456 –9465

Farlow MR. NMDA receptor antagonists. A new therapeutic approach for Alzheimer’s disease. Geriatrics. 2004 Jun;59(6):22-7.

Gabriel Gras and Marcus Kaul. Molecular mechanisms of neuroinvasion by monocytes-macrophages in HIV-1 infection. Gras and Kaul Retrovirology 2010, 7:30

 

Hangxiu Xu et al. The Human Immunodeficiency Virus Coat Protein gp120 Promotes Forward Trafficking and Surface Clustering of NMDA Receptors in Membrane Microdomains. The Journal of Neuroscience, November 23, 2011 • 31(47):17074 –17090

 

Hee Jung Kim et al. Human Immunodeficiency Virus Protein Tat Induces Synapse Loss via a Reversible Process That Is Distinct from Cell Death. The Journal of Neuroscience, November 26, 2008 • 28(48):12604 –12613

 

Huang, Y., Mucke, L. Alzheimer Mechanisms and Terapeutic Strategies. Cell, March 16, 2012. 148:1204-1222

 

Jones G. J., Barsby, N.L., et al. HIV-1 Vpr Causes Neuronal Apoptosis and In Vivo Neurodegeneration. The Journal of Neuroscience, April 4, 2007 • 27(14):3703–3711

 

Kragh, C. L., Ubhi, K., Wyss-Corey, T., Masliah, E. Autophagy in Dementias. Brain Pathology 22, 99-109, 2012.

 

Kramer-Hämmerle, S., Rothenarigner, I., Wolff, H., Bell, J. E., Brack-Werner, R. Cells of the central nervous system as targets and reservoirs of the human immunodeficiency virus. Virus Research 111 (2005) 194-213.

 

Lauren A. O’Donnell et al. Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-InducedNeurotoxicity: Roles for the NMDA Receptor Subtypes 2Aand 2B and the Calcium-Activated Protease Calpain by a CSF-derived HIV-1 Strain. The Journal of Neuroscience, January 18, 2006 • 26(3):981–990

Leslie Crews and Eliezer Masliah. Molecular mechanisms of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Human Molecular Genetics, 2010, Vol. 19, Review Issue

Liu Y, Jones M, Hingtgen CM, Bu G, Laribee N, Tanzi RE, Moir RD, Nath A, He JJ Uptake of HIV-1 Tat protein mediated by low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein disrupts the neuronal metabolic balance of the receptor ligands. Nat Med. 2000. 6:1380 –1387.

 

Marianne Strazza, Vanessa Pirrone, Brian Wigdahl, Michael R. Nonnemacher. Breaking down the barrier: The effects of HIV-1 on the blood–brain barrier. Brain Research 1 3 9 9 , 2 0 1 1 .  9 6 – 1 1 5

 

Midde, N. M., Gomez, A. M., Zhu, J. HIV-1 Tat Protein Decreases Dopamine Transporter Cell Surface Expression and Vesicular Monoamine Transporter-2 Function in Rat Striatal Synaptosomes. Neuroimmune Pharmacol, May 05, 2012.

 

Prasanta K. Dash et al. Loss of Neuronal Integrity during Progressive HIV-1 Infection of Humanized Mice. The Journal of Neuroscience, March 2, 2011 • 31(9):3148 –3157

 

Self RL, Mulholland PJ, Nath A, Harris BR, Prendergast MA The human immunodeficiency virus type-1 transcription factor Tat produces elevations in intracellular is Ca2+ that require function of an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor polyamine-sensitive site. Brain Res. 2004. 995:39–45.

 

Strazza M., Pirrone V., Wigdahl B., Nonnemacher M.R., Breaking down the barrier: The effects of HIV-1 on the blood–brain barrier, Brain Research, Volume 1399, 5 July 2011, Pages 96-115

 

Vermeire, J., Vanbillemont, G., Witkowski, W., Verhasselt, B. The Nef-Infectivity Enigma: Mechanisms of Enhanced Lentiviral Infection. Current HIV Research, 2011, Vol. 9 , No.7: 474-489

 

Wenxue Li et al. NMDA Receptor Activation by HIV-Tat Protein Is Clade Dependent. The Journal of Neuroscience, November 19, 2008 • 28(47):12190 –12198

 

 

Adicionar a favoritos link permanente.

Deixe uma resposta

O seu endereço de e-mail não será publicado. Campos obrigatórios são marcados com *